Data edition
2026-10Published ·
Automated decision scope
14 in automated verification / 91 catalog modelsData cutoff · 2026-10-01
Lifecycle coverage
56 lifecycle states documented / 91 · 14 in automation scopeData cutoff · 2026-10-01
01 · TASK RANKING

Everyday work

Drafting, analysis, planning, and mixed office tasks.

Official version
0
Public evidence
0
Data cutoff
Why these candidates
Assumption · Historical. Start with broadly capable models that have current public preference evidence, then test them on your own recurring work.
What remains uncertain
A general preference rank cannot predict accuracy on a specialized workflow.
Starting candidate

Three official versions to test first

Public data narrows the field. It does not replace a controlled test on your own work. Select two or three candidates for a side-by-side public data comparison.

0 / 3

Unknown · Not automatically certified

No comparable public result is currently mapped to this exact version.

← All task rankings
Public evidenceThe models use different public evidence scales. Missing evidence is not treated as zero, and OpenGPT does not combine unlike sources into one score.
A practical starting point, not a universal winnerSelect two or three candidates for a side-by-side public data comparison.

The models use different public evidence scales. Missing evidence is not treated as zero, and OpenGPT does not combine unlike sources into one score.

A general preference rank cannot predict accuracy on a specialized workflow.

The evaluation opens with this task template and the first two selected models. You can edit every task before collecting answers.