OpenGPTAI decision workspaceLMArena
The complete latest style-controlled overall ranking, based on users comparing two model answers side by side.
- Leaderboard publication date
- Aug 27, 2026
- Data retrieved
- Aug 28, 2026
- License
- CC BY 4.0
Independent model decisions
AI model rankings
Shortlist exact model versions from public evidence, compare them on one basis, then verify the choice on your own task.
- Rank 1claude-fable-5Anthropic1507
- Rank 2claude-opus-4-6-highAnthropic1505
- Rank 3claude-opus-4-7-highAnthropic1502
Published evaluation data2 external public sourcesEdition data cutoff
OpenGPT organizes published third-party evaluation data; it did not rerun these tests. Use the rankings to shortlist models, then validate them on your own work.
Choose a ranking metric
Start with the decision you need to make. Each scenario opens the most relevant published ranking signal. The original source and scale remain visible.
Show every publisher record with its source model ID or source name, including aliases and run configurations. Source ranks are preserved; ties can still cause rank numbers to skip.
User preference score. LMArena’s complete latest style-controlled overall ranking. Every publisher record keeps its source model ID; a provider-documented model ID appears separately when available.
Compared with previous edition Jul 21, 2026. Same source and method. Rank movement is relative; it does not by itself prove a change in model quality.
Showing 10 of 395. User preference score.
- Rank 1
claude-fable-5
Anthropic- Votes cast
- 25,824
- License type
- Closed / proprietaryProprietary
User preference score1507Based on anonymous head-to-head comparisonsLikely score range1,502.4–1,512.5View source
- Rank 2
claude-opus-4-6-high
Anthropic- Votes cast
- 72,104
- License type
- Closed / proprietaryProprietary
User preference score1505Based on anonymous head-to-head comparisonsLikely score range1,501.3–1,508.4View source
- Rank 3
claude-opus-4-7-high
Anthropic- Votes cast
- 60,136
- License type
- Closed / proprietaryProprietary
User preference score1502Based on anonymous head-to-head comparisonsLikely score range1,498.2–1,506.0View source
- Rank 4
- Votes cast
- 3,247
- License type
- Closed / proprietaryProprietary
User preference score1498Based on anonymous head-to-head comparisonsLikely score range1,487.9–1,508.8View source
- Rank 5
claude-opus-4-6
Anthropic- Votes cast
- 76,079
- License type
- Closed / proprietaryProprietary
User preference score1497Based on anonymous head-to-head comparisonsLikely score range1,493.9–1,500.8View source
- Rank 6
claude-opus-4-7
Anthropic- Votes cast
- 61,282
- License type
- Closed / proprietaryProprietary
User preference score1494Based on anonymous head-to-head comparisonsLikely score range1,490.5–1,498.2View source
- Rank 7
claude-opus-5-high
Anthropic- Votes cast
- 31,570
- License type
- Closed / proprietaryProprietary
User preference score1492Based on anonymous head-to-head comparisonsLikely score range1,487.2–1,496.6View source
- Rank 8
muse-spark-1.1
Meta- Votes cast
- 22,215
- License type
- Closed / proprietaryProprietary
User preference score1490Based on anonymous head-to-head comparisonsLikely score range1,485.2–1,495.6View source
- Rank 9
gemini-3.7-flash-high
Google- Votes cast
- 5,720
- License type
- Closed / proprietaryProprietary
User preference score1490Based on anonymous head-to-head comparisonsLikely score range1,481.9–1,498.2View source
- Rank 10
kimi-k3-max
Moonshot AI- Votes cast
- 16,586
- License type
- Kimi K3 license
User preference score1489Based on anonymous head-to-head comparisonsLikely score range1,483.2–1,494.5View source
Showing 10 of 395
Independent sourceLMArena395 source-listed model entries · Data retrieved: Aug 28, 2026
Ranking methodEach view preserves the source’s metric, release, and methodology. Follow the links to audit the underlying work.
Ranking basis
Full published ranking and official model IDs
The main ranking preserves every publisher record and shows its source model ID or source name. Every row can be compared: exact, configuration-safe mappings use official versions; all other rows stay within one source ranking. Missing data never becomes a zero score.- 79 official model IDs
- 79
- 0 with public ranking data
- 0
- 79 awaiting comparable data
- 79
- 395 source records retained for audit
- 395
Ranking basis
How to read this research edition
Scores stay on their original publisher scales. They are not combined into a composite score.
Missing data does not mean zero. It means the publisher did not report that metric for this snapshot.
When a source reports model settings, the position applies to that exact setup and source release—not every task, region, or deployment.
No provider can pay for placement. OpenGPT links directly to the evidence used.
Ranking basis
Data and sources
Each view preserves the source’s metric, release, and methodology. Follow the links to audit the underlying work.LiveBench
Twenty-three objective tasks across seven categories; questions refresh every six months.
- Source snapshot
- LiveBench-2026-06-25
- Data retrieved
- Aug 30, 2026
- License
- Apache-2.0 project license; exact new-livebench publication repository does not repeat a LICENSE file
Method version
A predictable publishing rhythm
OpenGPT checks active model sources every six hours. LMArena and LiveBench publish only after their versioned validation policies pass. Paused sources remain historical and do not enter current rankings.- 01
6-hour source checks
LMArena and LiveBench updates publish automatically only after schema, completeness, date, integrity, and anomaly checks. Paused sources stay historical.
- 02
Weekly change summary
Summarize meaningful ranking, model, and source changes in one reviewable update.
- 03
Monthly history snapshot
Freeze a dated snapshot with exact configurations, source releases, and corrections.