OpenGPTAI decision intelligenceStarting candidate 1
PreviewGemini 3.1 Pro
gemini-3.1-pro-previewGoogleNo comparable public result is currently mapped to this exact version.
04 · TASK RANKING
Documents & grounded Q&A
Long files, summaries, citations, and answers bounded by supplied text.
- Why these candidates
- Compare models positioned for sustained context or enterprise retrieval, then test exact citation and refusal behavior.
- What remains uncertain
- Context-window claims do not establish retrieval quality or faithful use of a long document.
Starting candidate
0 / 3Three official versions to test first
Public data narrows the field. It does not replace a controlled test on your own work. Select two or three candidates for a side-by-side public data comparison.
Starting candidate 2
General availabilityClaude Fable 5
claude-fable-5AnthropicGeneral capability · 3
Starting candidate 3
General availabilityCommand A+
command-a-plus-05-2026CohereNo comparable public result is currently mapped to this exact version.
Public evidenceThe models use different public evidence scales. Missing evidence is not treated as zero, and OpenGPT does not combine unlike sources into one score.＋
Gemini 3.1 Pro
No comparable public result is currently mapped to this exact version.
Claude Fable 5
- Source rank
- 3
- Source value
- 62
- Mapping reviewed
- Official identity mapping
- Official identity mapping ↗
- Research edition
- 2026-08 ·
Command A+
No comparable public result is currently mapped to this exact version.
A practical starting point, not a universal winnerSelect two or three candidates for a side-by-side public data comparison.＋
The models use different public evidence scales. Missing evidence is not treated as zero, and OpenGPT does not combine unlike sources into one score.
Context-window claims do not establish retrieval quality or faithful use of a long document.
The evaluation opens with this task template and the first two selected models. You can edit every task before collecting answers.