Shared benchmark scope · OSWorld 2.0

Same-benchmark agent comparison

The entries below share the same benchmark scope. Their exact scaffolds, model versions, dates, and original source values remain visible.

A higher source value only means better performance on this benchmark and configuration. It is not a cross-benchmark or production-readiness score.

Compare like with like

Decision overview

Only configurations from the same benchmark version and task scope can be placed in one comparison.

Source-reported data; missing values remain unknown.
AnthropicOSWorld Agent · Claude Opus 4.8 · Max · Standard
Binary completion18.52%Cost per successful taskNot publishedPublished result rangeNot published
Agent details
AnthropicOSWorld Agent · Claude Opus 4.8 · Max · Batched tool
Binary completion20.6%Cost per successful taskNot publishedPublished result rangeNot published
Agent details
18 identical or entirely unreported fields hidden
Agent systemOSWorld Agent · Claude Opus 4.8 · Max · StandardOSWorld Agent · Claude Opus 4.8 · Max · Batched tool
Configuration
ToolsStandard computer-use toolBatched computer-use tool
Outcome
Binary completion18.52%20.6%
Partial score49.33%54.8%
Source
Open sourceOpen sourceOpen source

Configuration

OSWorld Agent · Claude Opus 4.8 · Max · Standard

Tools
Standard computer-use tool

OSWorld Agent · Claude Opus 4.8 · Max · Batched tool

Tools
Batched computer-use tool

Outcome

OSWorld Agent · Claude Opus 4.8 · Max · Standard

Binary completion
18.52%
Partial score
49.33%

OSWorld Agent · Claude Opus 4.8 · Max · Batched tool

Binary completion
20.6%
Partial score
54.8%

Source

Source-reported data; missing values remain unknown.

Validate before adoption

Public rankings create a shortlist. A small private trial decides whether the configuration fits your work.

  1. 1

    Choose 10–20 representative tasks and define a clear pass condition.

  2. 2

    Lock the agent, model, tools, permissions, and budget before testing.

  3. 3

    Run each important task more than once; record success, cost, time, and takeovers.

  4. 4

    Review failures and data-handling risks before a production decision.

Agent directory and evaluations